Skip to main content

Table 2 Characteristics of case deliberation

From: Evaluating empowerment towards responsible conduct of research in a small private online course

Ā Ā 

All cases (47)

Own case (13)

Pregiven case (34)

Length of reflection

Very brief

6 (12.8%)

2 (15.4%)

4 (11.8%)

Small sentences

23 (48,9%)

3 (23.1%)

20 (58.8%)

Full sentences

18 (38,3%)

8 (61.5%)

10 (29.4%)

Misconduct or QRP

Misconduct

15 (31.9%)

4 (30.8%)

11 (32.3%)

QRP

30 (63.8%)

8 (61.5%)

21 (61.7%)

undecided

2 (4.3%)

1 (7.7%)

1 (2.9%)

Average number Considerations

Ā 

4.44

5,08

4.21

St dev

1.59

1.93

1.41

Taken perspective

None

20 (42.5%)

5 (38.4%)

15 (44.11%)

One

21 (44.7%)

4 (30.8%)

17 (50%)

multiple

6 (12.8%)

4 (30.8%)

2 (5.8%)

Principle/values

None mentioned

5 (10.6%)

1 (7.7%)

4 (11.8%)

Mentioned, not explained

30 (63.8%)

11 (84.6%)

17 (50%)

Mentioned, explained

12 (25.5%)

2:1 (7.7%)

13 (38.2%)

Reasoned decision

Yes

15 (32.6%)

7 (54.8%)

8 (23.5%)

No

32 (68.1%)

6 (46.2%)

26 (76.4%)

Action oriented

No

10(21.2%)

3 (23.1%)

7 (20.6%)

One action

23 (48.9%)

9 (69.2%)

14 (41.2%)

Multiple steps

14 (29.8%)

1 (7.7%)

13 (38.2%)

Reflection model used?

No

3 (6.4%)

1 (7.7%)

2 (5.9%)

Superficially

8 (17%)

1 (7.7%)

7 (20.6%)

Fully

36 (76.5%)

11 (84.6%)

25 (73.5%)