Skip to main content

Table 2 Knowledge of participants on academic dishonesty

From: Causes and mitigation of academic dishonesty among healthcare students in a Nigerian university

 

Statement (N = 335)

Responses

Frequency (%)

1

Academic dishonesty is committing or contributing to any unethical behaviour while completing work

Correct

201 (60.0)

2

Academic dishonesty can only be carried out by students

Correct

159 (47.5)

3

Students who cheat in academic activities may cheat in other areas of life, work and family

Correct

243 (72.5)

4

Public safety and welfare may be compromised on the long run in related professions due to cheating by such students

Correct

292 (87.2)

5

Academic dishonesty can impair instructors accuracy in assessing actual mastery of skills and knowledge of cheating students

Correct

286 (85.4)

6

Academic dishonesty can take various forms

Correct

321 (95.8)

b. Forms of academic dishonesty identified by respondents

Frequency (%)a

1

Unauthorised use of materials, devices, or practices in completing academic activities

265 (79.1)

2

Use of another person’s ideas without proper acknowledgement or permission

236 (70.4)

3

Unauthorised creation, alteration, or misrepresentation of information

191 (57.0)

4

Disrupting another person’s work so that the person cannot complete an academic activity

189 (56.4)

5

Impersonating another person during an exam or test

261 (77.9)

6

Unauthorised collaboration during a test or exam

180 (53.7)

7

Not contributing as required to a team project and allowing the team effort to fail

195 (58.2)

8

Inventing a source of data or information that does not exist

168 (50.1)

9

Copying answers from a fellow student during a test or exam

247 (73.7)

10

Taking unauthorised materials (E.g. Mobile phones) into the exam hall

263 (78.5)

11

Attempting to bribe examination invigilators or examiners during/after an exam

270 (80.6)

12

Exchanging examination booklets with a fellow student so as to copy his/her answers

259 (77.3)

 

Mean knowledge score ± SD (Range)

Total obtainable score: 18 points

10.57 ± 4.629 points (0–18 points)

 

Scores categories

Frequency (%)

Remark

 < 50%

98 (29.3)

Poor knowledge

50–69%

137 (40.9)

Fair knowledge

 > 70%

100 (29.8)

Good knowledge

  1. SD Standard deviation
  2. aItem had multiple responses