Skip to main content

Table 3 Knowledge of participants on predatory publishing after the webinar

From: Distance education as a tool to improve researchers’ knowledge on predatory journals in countries with limited resources: the Moroccan experience

Questions

Outcomes (%/n)

Did you learn what a predatory/hijacked journal is during this webinar?

 Yes

81 (179)

 No

19 (42)

Are you able to identify predatory journals after this webinar?

 Yes

81.4 (180)

 No

18.6 (41)

After this webinar, do you feel motivated to share information about predatory journals with your colleagues?

 Yes

83.7 (185)

 No

16.3 (36)

What are the reasons for submitting research to predatory journals?a

 -Low open access fees

24.9 (55)

 -Absence of peer-review

10.9 (24)

 -Rapid decision

32.1 (71)

 -Not important for me to be predatory or not

3.6 (18)

 -No time to target good peer-reviewed journals

5.9 (13)

 -Recommendation by the supervisor

5.9 (13)

 -Their invitation emails are encouraging

7.7 (17)

The Beall’s list was developed to help authors from being easily scammed by predatory journals. Will you check Beall’s list of potential predatory journals and publishers before submitting?

 Yes

58.4 (129)

 No

41.6 (92)

Why do you think predatory journals particularly target scientists from under-resourced countries?a

 -Low and affordable article processing charges for open access

35.7 (79)

 -Not well informed on predatory publishing

33 (73)

 -Research of poor quality

13.1 (29)

 -They like rapid publication process

25.8 (57)

 -Not well informed on the process of peer-review in science

20.8 (46)

Do you think publishing in predatory journals poses a risk to your future career?

 Yes

73.8 (163)

 No

10.9 (24)

 I don’t know

15.4 (34)

What do you propose to prevent predatory publishing?a

 -Training workshops and webinars

79.6 (176)

 -Surveillance of researchers by their supervisors and affiliations during the submission process

48 (106)

 -Use of social networks to increase awareness on predatory journals

47.1 (104)

 -Research institutes should take action against scientists who publish in predatory journals

37.1 (82)

After this webinar, will you be submitting your research to a predatory journal?

 No

81.9 (181)

 Yes, because I am under pressure to publish

12.2 (27)

 Missing data

5.9 (13)

  1. abinary outcomes retrieved from multiple choice questionnaire