Skip to main content

Table 2 Knowledge of participants on academic publishing and predatory journals before the webinar

From: Distance education as a tool to improve researchers’ knowledge on predatory journals in countries with limited resources: the Moroccan experience

Questions

Outcomes (%/n)

Do you verify journal quality before selecting a journal for submission?

 Yes

62 (137)

 No

38 (84)

According to you, what is the best quality parameter to consider when selecting a journal for publication?a

 -Peer-review

30.8 (68)

 -Open access

29 (64)

 -Publishing using subscription-based model

4.1 (9)

 -Publisher prestige

9.5 (21)

 -The journal must be published by an international society

10.9 (24)

 -Google Scholar indexing

20.4 (45)

 -Pubmed indexing

22.2 (49)

 -Scopus indexing

75.6 (167)

 -Web of Science indexing

33.9 (75)

 -Double indexing

12.7 (28)

 -Triple indexing

21.3 (47)

 -Impact factor (according to Journal Citation Report-Clarivate Analytics®)

49.3 (109)

Do you feel pressure to publish from your supervisor, institution, and research funding agency?

 Yes

43.4 (96)

 No

31.7 (70)

 I prefer not to answer

24.9 (55)

Did you know about predatory journals before participating in this webinar?

 Yes

48.9 (108)

 No

51.1 (113)

Have you ever been invited to publish in a predatory journal via email?

 Yes

38 (84)

 No

52.9 (117)

 I don’t know

9 (20)

Have you ever published articles in predatory journals?

 Yes

5.4 (12)

 No

87.8 (194)

 I didn’t know if it was a predatory journal

6.8 (15)

Do you think that articles published in predatory journals have the same quality as those published in peer-reviewed journals?

 Yes

88.7 (196)

 No

11.3 (25)

  1. abinary outcomes retrieved from multiple choice questionnaire