Skip to main content

Table 8 Faculty Familiarity with University Policies Towards Academic Dishonesty by Gender, Year, and Discipline

From: Student and faculty perceptions of, and experiences with, academic dishonesty at a medium-sized Canadian university

Demographic (n) Familiar: Yes (%) Familiar: No (%)
Gender
 Do not wish to identify 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%)
 Non-binary 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%)
 Female 39 (92.9%) 3 (%)
 Male 38 (86.4%) 6 (%)
Years of experience in postsecondary education
 5 or fewer 13 (81.3%) 3 (18.7%)
 6–10 12 (85.7%) 2 (14.3%)
 11–20 26 (89.7%) 3 (10.3%)
 21–30 17 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%)
 31+ 10 (90.9%) 1 (9.1%)
Discipline teaching in
 Arts & Sciences - Sciences 23 (85.2%) 4 (14.8%)
 Dhillon School of Business 13 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%)
 Arts & Science - Humanities 9 (81.8%) 2 (18.2%)
 Health Science/Nursing 10 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%)
 Fine Arts 7 (87.5%) 1 (12.5%)
 Arts & Science - Social Sciences 7 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%)
 Education 2 (40.0%) 3 (60.0%)
 School of Liberal Education 2 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%)
 Other 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%)
  1. Percentages are representative of the total proportion of participants who indicated either “yes” or “no” to the question, “Are you familiar with the policies within the University towards reporting academic dishonesty?” Aggregated counts of each demographic category are also presented in Table 2
Back to article page

International Journal for Educational Integrity

ISSN: 1833-2595

Contact us