Skip to main content

Table 3 Explaining EM in case studies

From: Attitudes towards cheating behavior during assessing students᾽performance: student and teacher perspectives

 

Respondents

Correct

Partially correct

Incorrect

Total

Case study 1

Teacher

31

2

9

42

%

73.8

4.8

21.4

100%

Student

98

0

22

120

%

81.7

0

18.3

100

Total

129

2

31

162

%

79.6

1.2

19.1

100

Case study 2

p<.05; Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) = 0.001, C=0.32

Teacher

39

0

3

42

%

92.9

0

7.1

100

Student

70

36

13

119

%

58.8

30.2

10.9

100

Total

109

36

16

161

%

67.7

22.4

9.9

100

Case study 3

Teacher

38

0

4

42

%

90.5

0

9.5

100

Student

113

0

5

118

%

95.8

0

4.2

100

Total

151

0

9

160

%

94.4

0

5.6

100

Case study 4

Teacher

12

23

7

42

%

28.6

54.8

16.7

100

Student

39

72

8

119

%

32.8

60.5

6.7

100

Total

51

95

15

161

%

31.7

59.0

9.3

100

Case study 5

Teacher

30

0

12

42

%

71.4

0.0

28.6

100

Student

56

1

62

119

%

47.1

0.8

52.1

100

Total

86

1

74

161

%

53.4

0.6

46.0

100

Case study 6

p<.05; Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) = 0.035, C=0.25

Teacher

35

7

0

42

%

83.3

16.7

0.0

100

Student

69

38

9

116

%

59.5

32.8

7.8

100

Total

104

45

9

158

%

65.8

28.5

5.7

100

Case study 7

Teacher

32

8

2

42

%

76.2

19.0

4.8

100

Student

69

31

20

120

%

57.5

25.8

16.7

100

Total

101

39

22

162

%

62.3

24.1

13.6

100

Case study 8

Teacher

17

25

0

42

%

40.5

59.5

0.0

100

Student

28

81

9

118

%

23.7

68.6

7.6

100

Total

45

106

9

160

%

28.1

66.2

5.6

100