Skip to main content

Table 3 Explaining EM in case studies

From: Attitudes towards cheating behavior during assessing students᾽performance: student and teacher perspectives

  Respondents Correct Partially correct Incorrect Total
Case study 1 Teacher 31 2 9 42
% 73.8 4.8 21.4 100%
Student 98 0 22 120
% 81.7 0 18.3 100
Total 129 2 31 162
% 79.6 1.2 19.1 100
Case study 2
p<.05; Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) = 0.001, C=0.32
Teacher 39 0 3 42
% 92.9 0 7.1 100
Student 70 36 13 119
% 58.8 30.2 10.9 100
Total 109 36 16 161
% 67.7 22.4 9.9 100
Case study 3 Teacher 38 0 4 42
% 90.5 0 9.5 100
Student 113 0 5 118
% 95.8 0 4.2 100
Total 151 0 9 160
% 94.4 0 5.6 100
Case study 4 Teacher 12 23 7 42
% 28.6 54.8 16.7 100
Student 39 72 8 119
% 32.8 60.5 6.7 100
Total 51 95 15 161
% 31.7 59.0 9.3 100
Case study 5 Teacher 30 0 12 42
% 71.4 0.0 28.6 100
Student 56 1 62 119
% 47.1 0.8 52.1 100
Total 86 1 74 161
% 53.4 0.6 46.0 100
Case study 6
p<.05; Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) = 0.035, C=0.25
Teacher 35 7 0 42
% 83.3 16.7 0.0 100
Student 69 38 9 116
% 59.5 32.8 7.8 100
Total 104 45 9 158
% 65.8 28.5 5.7 100
Case study 7 Teacher 32 8 2 42
% 76.2 19.0 4.8 100
Student 69 31 20 120
% 57.5 25.8 16.7 100
Total 101 39 22 162
% 62.3 24.1 13.6 100
Case study 8 Teacher 17 25 0 42
% 40.5 59.5 0.0 100
Student 28 81 9 118
% 23.7 68.6 7.6 100
Total 45 106 9 160
% 28.1 66.2 5.6 100