Skip to main content

Table 1 Frequency count, mean and standard deviation of perception responses (n = 100)

From: Algorithmically-driven writing and academic integrity: exploring educators' practices, perceptions, and policies in AI era

Perceptions

StronglyDisagree

Dis-agree

Neutral

Agree

StronglyAgree

Mean

Interpret-ation

SD

1. I have sufficient knowledge of how to use ChatGPT and other AI-powered DWTs under discussion

22

20

17

31

10

2.87

Neutral

1.34

2. I have sufficient skills to coach my students to use ChatGPT and other AI-powered DWTs under discussion

27

23

22

19

9

2.60

Neutral

1.31

3. I intend to use and keep using ChatGPT and other AI-powered DWTs under discussion

19

8

26

35

12

3.13

Neutral

1.29

4. ChatGPT and other AI-powered DWTs are helpful for my teaching-related tasks

10

8

29

35

18

3.43

Agree

1.17

5. ChatGPT and other AI-powered DWTs are useful in my research-and-publishing-related tasks

12

6

30

34

18

3.40

Agree

1.21

6. I believe that ChatGPT and other AI-powered DWTs are helpful for my learning

7

11

24

40

18

3.51

Agree

1.12

7. I am aware of the dangers of ChatGPT if educators and institutions do not set clear policies for its ethical use

8

0

5

26

61

4.32

Strongly Agree

1.14

8. Institutions should require their students to report their use of ChatGPT and the other aforementioned AI-powered DWTs in their graded outputs

8

5

15

28

44

3.95

Agree

1.23

9. Institutions should require their faculty to report their use of ChatGPT and the aforementioned AI-powered DWTs in their reports, research, and other performance tasks

10

8

13

33

36

3.77

Agree

1.29

10. Students should not be allowed to use Digital Writing Assistants (DWAs) such as Grammarly and Automated Paraphrasing Tools such as Paraphrase Online in outputs in which grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and organization are graded

28

30

15

15

12

2.53

Disagree

1.36